HCDC vs NIHE data
Compare births from HCDC vs Registry
Some findings:
NIHE data have higher birth counts in 2016 - 2018 which contributes to lower coverage (2022, 2014 low counts are due to incomplete data collection). This maybe an indication that the threshold for duplicate matching is too high (but lowering it may impact result for 2019-2021)
Discrepancies diminishes overtime (NIHE even slightly under under reported number of births for some districts by 2021)
Over-reported (compared to HCDC) birth counts in NIHE happen accross all districts (except Hoc Mon)
Click on the district to view number of births over the year for that district
Note: \(Ratio = \frac{\text{Total births from NIHE}}{\text{Total births from HCDC data}}\)
`summarise()` has grouped output by 'namsinh'. You can override using the
`.groups` argument.
`summarise()` has grouped output by 'birth_year'. You can override using the
`.groups` argument.
rmarkdown::paged_table(count_by_district %>% select(-joinkey))Compare vaccinated children count from HCDC vs Registry
Some findings:
- Records from NIHE show lower vaccinated population compared to HCDC data, especially in 2016-2018 and 2021 which further contribute to the discrepancies in coverage for those years in particular
- Similar to birth counts, the discrepancies between HCDC and NIHE count can be found across all districts
- The vaccinated population for District 1 is the most consistent between HCDC and NIHE
Click on the district to view number of vaccinated children over the year for that district
Note:
\(Ratio = \frac{\text{Vaccinated children from NIHE}}{\text{Vaccinated children from HCDC data}}\)
`summarise()` has grouped output by 'birth_year'. You can override using the
`.groups` argument.
rmarkdown::paged_table(vacc_by_district %>% select(-joinkey))NIHE coverage vs HCDC coverage
Discrepancy between coverage calculated from HCDC and NIHE is consistent across all districts
`summarise()` has grouped output by 'district'. You can override using the
`.groups` argument.
Geo plot for coverage computed from HCDC data
I had some bug when trying to load map with merged Thu Duc city which have not been resolved so the coverage for Thu Duc in the following map is in fact coverage for Thu Duc district, District 2 and District 9